User loginNavigation |
Why Dakka and INAT FAQs stinkAn example: INAT FAQ 3.0: +SM.71A.01 – Q: Can a Techmarine embarked on a INAT FAQ 3.2: +SM.71A.01 – Q: Can a Space Marine Techmarine who started the turn embarked on a vehicle attempt to repair it? None of the codices in question changed between these FAQs. It's just a rules change written less clearly. The Dakka people try to fill a hole made by the rules writing at Games Workshop, which don't seem to have much in the way of playtesting or proofreading. Unfortunately they cover what are majority decisions, subject to arbitrary changes, with legalese and self-referential citations.
|